Search Results Weighing Based on Artist Sales-to-Inventory Ratio


This may already be (secretly) implemented, but if not, I thought it might be a good policy to partially favor artists in search results that have a better sales-to-inventory ratio.

What I mean is this: Comparing two hypothetical Pond5 artists: artist 'A' has 10,000 clips and 700 sales. Artist 'B' has 2,000 clips and 1,800 sales. Obviously, artist 'B' has a better "grasp" as to what is "good" and what is "wanted" by customers, as seen by his higher sales-to-inventory ratio.

Now, say both artists have a very similar "person using iPad" shot. A customer searches for "person using iPad," and in the seemingly endless search results, the relevant clip(s) from artist 'B' would be more likely to appear before artist 'A's clips.

This would help customers since it would show in search results those clips from artists who tend to sell more, since artists who tend to sell more arguably have more diverse and desirable portfolios.  It would also reward those artists who do not practice "inventory flooding" (i.e., uploading gobs and gobs of clips that probably won't sell).

Maybe this should even be a public stat in producer profiles.  Perhaps some sort of "badge" or  "reward" icon? Maybe those producers with better sales-to-inventory ratios could appear more often in the "featured artist" section on the homepage?  (It seems now, that section is 100% random, which is therefore, basically worthless.)

Now, I'm NOT saying this sales-to-inventory ratio should be the ONLY parameter in search results weighting, but perhaps it should be a PART of it.  Thoughts?

If it's determined that this is "too unfair," then at the very least, may I suggest this sales-to-inventory ratio be added to producer portfolios, even it it has no bearing on search results otherwise?  Maybe labeling it something like: "Sales Success: 85%" or something.  I don't know exactly how to reach that value, perhaps it's as easy as dividing a producer's sales by his total number of clips?

I suppose you'd have to throw some sort of time calculations into this equation, since artists who no longer actively submit could potentially throw off this ratio, since their portfolios no longer grow but continue to sell.

But I'll leave all this up to your programmers should this idea be pursued. 

2 commentaires

Sort by: Date Votes
  • Avatar

    Sorry, don't agree with this thinking at all. If you have an artist uploading lots of great clips all the time he will be penalised because his sales won't "catch up". This will be no good for great artists with lots of brand new material.

    Whereas other artist who has been on Pond5 for years, uploads virtually nothing now but has a few sales will benefit because the algorithm will assume he's a great seller for the number of clips he has up. 

  • Avatar

    Also in disagreement.  This would penalize newer artists, by placing their submissions at the end of the queue.  Zero sales, regardless of the number of clips submitted by an artist will land them at the end, regardless of quality of submissions.  One sale out of one submission would land a seller at the top (100% success).  That's not right either. 

    Pond 5 customers will also be penalized, as the same clips will show up earlier in the queue.  The result would be more sales of stale clips, less freshness, and eventually a decreased customer base which hurts everyone.

    There's no way to quantify quality, because the definition of quality is different in every circumstance.  Random is good.  It gives everybody an equal shot.      











Vous devez vous connecter pour laisser un commentaire.